This text is the basis for the discussion of the organization of the third conference being planned by Projekt Oekonux.

This text is most of all an OpenTheory project, so recent contributions and current state can be found there. Also contributions can be made at any time there. All contributions made are automatically relayed to projekt at oekonux.de where the conference is prepared.

Besides these notices here there also is a bulletin from the 2. conference.

To be easier to understand and comment the OpenTheory document is separated into several single pieces. Direct links to each piece are given in the text below. An overview of all sub-projects is here:

• Basics
• About the organization
• Who should be invited for a presentation?

---

1. Basics

This part is one piece in OpenTheory where you can comment on.

1.1. Content of the conference

1.1.1. Motto

The motto of the conference is

Reichtum durch Copyleft

Kreativität im digitalen Zeitalter

or

Wealth by copyleft

Creativity in the digital age

It would be nice if topics on the conference would match this motto.

1.1.2. Oekonux track

Another proposal is to have a noticeable fraction of contributions form us, i.e. the people making up the Oekonux project, which tell about what we think on the Oekonux mailing lists. In the past Oekonux conferences this part was very small. This led to many rather basic questions about Oekonux theory in many presentations from those, who didn't know Oekonux well at this time.

An interesting extension of such contributions could be that they give an outline of what happened in the project until now. What has been discussed and where is the respective discussion today.

For this we should reserve an extra day or an extra track. It might be a good idea to take the Thursday for that so people new to Oekonux have the introduction in the beginning. A worse alternative would be to reserve a normal track for such contributions.

It would be nice if such a big introduction into Oekonux theory could be followed by an open end plenary session where the need for general discussions with each other could have a place.

1.1.3. Extending the focus

Another proposal is to widen the focus of the conference to address people not interested in Free Software so much but want to get inspired (e.g. young Attacis).

Perhaps the framework of content can be more shifted to information society for which Free Software is the most developed germ form today. For instance the question of "intellectual property" should play a role. For this it is convenient to include issues far from software (e.g. music, drugs / generica).

We should take into account that the WOS conference three weeks later has a similar concept - though there are also differences. However, there is unfortunately some chance that there is a competition for the same speakers.

Also there may be another conference in the spirit of the OC conference just a week after the Oekonux Conference. This may create even more competition.

1.2. International conference

Once more the conference should be laid out as an international conference. This includes:

• the invitation of international contributors,
• announcement in English and distribution in international media,
• translation of the most important parts of the conference web site,
• (simultaneous) translation during the conference
  • People who want to translate during a presentation into English or German, could be made recognizable so people interested in this translation can sit close to this and listen.
    Though simple to have this sort of whispering translation is a bit disruptive for others.
  • On a job list for professional translators we asked whether someone would like to help while receiving the same benefits as speakers. Actually there were some three of four people who offered help.
    There will be no technical infrastructure for real simultaneous translation (cabin, headphones, etc.). However, all of the professional translators who offered help seem to be ready to accepts whispering translation as well.

Contrary to the 2. conference we should not have a separate English track.

1.3. Responsible body and supporters

The official organizer for the conference is the Projekt Oekonux e.V..

The rooms will be supplied by the Department of Philosophy at Vienna University by courtesy of Herbert Hrachovec. So these are co-organizers.

A possible supporter could be Public Voice Lab.

As further (financial) supporters the following have been asked:

• Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung
  They made no hope for substantial amounts of money if at all.
• Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung
  Showed some interest. Probably will be clarified during January.
• Bewegungsstiftung
• Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung
• Soros Foundation / Open Society Institute
  Their reaction so far was to ask for more information.

At the Austrian attac summer academy there has been interest in the conference. May be some support could come from Attac Austria.

In Vienna Franz Nahrada organized a group of people. They founded an own mailing list. May be financial support also is organized by these Vienna based people.

At the 2. conference we had a well working model where sponsors supported certain presentations. If they fit into the conference this could be repeated.

Before and after the 2. conference some donations could be acquired. During the conference we asked the visitors for a donation instead of an admission fee.

---

2. About the organization

This part is one piece in OpenTheory where you can comment on.

2.1. Basics

2.1.1. Timing and dates

The conference will take place 2004-05-20 to 2004-05-23 (Thursday to Sunday).

The presentations should be planned in a way so arrival and departure from/to Germany by train are feasible on Thursday or Sunday, respectively.

The following time line is proposed:

Time	Activity	State
October	First meeting in Vienna	ok
	Raise financial issue	ok
	Room issue resolved	ok
	ToDo-Text V1.0	ok
November	ToDo-Text V2.0	ok (V3)
Early December	CfC beta	ok (October)
Late December	CfC gets published	ok (November)
	Online services get informed	ok
February	Financial issue resolved
	Lists [rox] and [hox] are re-founded	ok (October)
Early March	Deadline for abstracts
	Press campaign starts
Late March	Decisions about the contributions
	Schedule
Middle April	Conference schedule V1.0 online
20.-23. May	ox3 is running

2.2. Types of presentations

The possible types of presentations include:

• Talks
• Workshops
• Panels
• Spontaneous discussion rounds (aka BOF sessions)
• Annual member meeting of the e.V.
• Meta round at the end of the conference

See the Visitor FAQ for an explanation. Further types of presentation are possible on request.

2.3. Infrastructure

2.3.1. Rooms

The rooms will be supplied by the Department of Philosophy at Vienna University.

Childcare and disabled access might have to be considered.

The 1. conference was attended by 170 people, the 2. conference by 150. For the 2. conference more or less exactly came who had registered before.

We need to consider whether we want to have three tracks again which basically will take place in three fixed rooms.

2.3.2. Social infrastructure

• Get-together
  • A relaxed get-together with food, where people can talk, and later music would be the best. We need to care for catering.
• Sleeping places for the speakers are needed
• Mass accommodation for guests would be nice

2.3.3. Technical infrastructure

• Audio recording of all presentations
  • One possibility is to record the presentations with a (fixed) laptop and an external microphone. Besides laptops and microphones the laptops need some spare disk space. Good microphones and/or good pre-amplifiers are needed.
  • The co-organizers in Vienna offered an Internet audio live stream.
• IRC channels
  Especially if we have audio live streams it would be great to have
  • an IRC channel for each track
  • which is logged on a web site and
  • projected in the event
  
  This way people could participate online at the conference.
  Also if we have wireless Internet connection in the rooms we could have an immediate online protocol of the events.
• Video recording if not too much effort
• Internet connection
  At best by Ethernet (at some central point) and Wireless (at least in the presentation rooms).
• Surf stations
• Beamer

2.3.4. Mailing lists

• For the concrete arrangement of the presentations and for the organization there is a mailing list for all speakers ([rox])
• For the concrete arrangement of the activities on site there is a mailing list for all helpers ([hox])
• For the concrete arrangement in Vienna there is another mailing list.

2.3.5. Folder for visitors

All visitors should get an up-to-date folder with at least this content:

• The flyer
• Request for a donation
• A list of the local infrastructure outside the conference
  • Cigarettes
  • Restaurants
  • Recommended accommodation
  • A town map containing the conference location
• The conference program
  • An up-to-date schedule
  • Abstracts of all presentations
  
  To make the abstracts a bit more uniform we should set a lower and an upper limit for the length of an abstract. Also it would be nice to have English versions of all abstracts.
  • Vitae of the speakers
  
  This should include pictures of the speakers. Also it would be good to have pictures of the speakers on the web site.
• Short self-description of the Oekonux project
• Perhaps the Kladde
• Map of the building / the rooms where presentations take place
• Questionnaire for feedback
  See also hints about the design of the questionnaire.

2.3.6. Support for the presentations

The presentations need to be cared about. This includes:

• Operating the audio recording
• If IRC channels and Wireless is available: Care for a possible IRC projection and may be people who live protocol a bit.
• Support the speaker with presentation technique
• If needed: Care for translation
• Start the presentation including a sufficient introduction of the speaker
• React to disturbances of all kind in an appropriate way
• Check time limits, signal end
  In particular care for ending the session so the free quarter of an hour before the next slot actually exists.
• Check microphone direction during the discussion
• Moderate the discussion if necessary
• Special tasks if this is the last presentation in this room of this day

Technical briefing for the people doing this job is absolutely necessary.

People supporting a presentation should contact the respective speaker and ask how s/he wants to be introduced and other questions.

2.3.7. Remaining infrastructure

• Oekonux texts on paper, in particular the Kladde for a quick introduction
• A conference bureau
  • Supplied by the Department of Philosophy
  • May need additional people
• Some international guests may need to be fetched from the air port.
• A big, public sheet of paper where people can write down open questions, thoughts, and so on. May be used as the basis for a final content plenum.

2.4. Money

2.4.1. Expenditures

• Travel expenses for contributors
  • Perhaps the current LastMinute offers of the German railway can be used to offer speakers two nights of accommodation in addition to the railway trip. Depending on the BahnCard available on the speaker side this can be a cheap way to acquire accommodation.
  
  Probably this option is not available at this weekend because this weekend is a major tourist weekend in Vienna.
  • The offers of CityNightLine can help to save accommodation.
• Further expenses
• As in 2001 honorarium for contributors is not planned

We must that only expenses agreed to before are refunded. In particular this applies to cases where contributors want the refunding of further persons.

2.4.2. Income

• Money of the e.V.
• Donations before and after the conference
  We asked for donations for the conference in 2001. This worked to some degree.
• Donations from the visitors
  Last time we asked for 8EUR per person. Including tickets for food and beverages we received about 10EUR on average per person.

2.5. Announcement

2.5.1. Forms

The announcement of the conference will be more or less exclusively by electronic media.

A German web site is set up already. Also a English web site.

A template for a paper announcement (flyer, poster) can be made.

We should consider asking Linux print media (e.g. Linux-Magazin) and/or for instance c't (what in Austria?) for a gratis advertisement.

2.5.2. Call for Contributions

The Call for Contributions (no longer "Call for Papers") should be distributed at least to the following addresses. (At the time this version has been written this has been done already except where noted.)

• German speaking
  • the FIFF list
  • Contraste list
  • the Krisis newsletter (http://www.krisis.org)
  • Indymedia
    Not yet.
  • debate at fitug.de
  • http://listserv.shuttle.de/mailman/listinfo/wissen2
  • FFII lists
  • Telepolis / Heise-Ticker
  • infoverteiler at nadir.org
  • Mail list of streifzuege.org in Vienna (Lorenz Glatz, Franz Schandl et al)
  • http://de.groups.yahoo.com/group/list48/
  • imd-l or imd-announce, respectively
  • WOS preparation list
  • Wsis at ilpostino.jpberlin.de
  • clara-liste at yahoogroups.de
  • AKI-list http://www.aki-stuttgart.de
  • Some German print media
  • further?
• International
  • Nettime
  • OpenFlows
  • Indymedia
  • The people of Mama in Zagreb
  • Hipatia
  • http://www.politechbot.com/
  • WoZ - Schweizer WochenZeitschrift http://www.woz.ch
  • Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR) cpsr at cpsr.org
  • further?
• Structures of the Free Software scene
  • FSF-Europe, English (discussion) und German (fsfe-de) lists
  • Linux.de
  • e.g. Linux-Community
• The people behind the Oekonux links
• The persons we want to invite explicitly listed below
• All speakers of the 1. and 2. conference
• All registered visitors of the 2. conference

Some addresses can be found in a version of this text for the 2. conference.

2.5.3. Invitation

The invitation should be sent at least to the same as the Call for Contributions.

---

3. Who should be invited for a presentation?

This part is one piece in OpenTheory where you can comment on.

3.1. Suggestions

In the following list at the start of each suggestion the suggester is named in square brackets (if known and remembered). In general this should be the person who cares about building contact. If persons are mentioned below they have been sent the Call for Contribution unless noted otherwise. If there is - to my knowledge - some reaction from them already this is also noted.

I tried to create some categories based on content so the list is easier to understand and patterns may become visible.

3.1.1. Principles of Free Software in...

3.1.1.1. ...school / education

• [StefanMn] Karl Sarnow from Freie Software und Bildung.
• [StefanMn] Hans-Peter Prenzel from OpenWebSchool.
• [StefanMn] Heiko Degenhardt from PingoS
• [FranzT] Rebeca and Mauricio Wild (alternative school and economic systems / Ecuador) showed very much interest in Oekonux last summer.
  I don't know whether they received a CfC.

3.1.1.2. ...material production

• [StefanMn] Someone who can tell us something about fabbers and similar machines I would like to see on the conference very much. http://www.smalltimes.com/document_display.cfm?document_id=6413 might be an idea but I guess we could find someone from Europe.
• [StefanMn] Christoph Beaupoil, who together with Graham gave a spontaneous session on the 2. conference about Free Hardware / Free Design should be asked explicitly.

3.1.1.3. ...in science

• [StefanMn] I met Michael Zaiser at the "We Seize!" conference. He did studies on the theory of self-organized studies. Also - as far as I understood - he just created a scientific magazine from pre-print server articles. There are Free scientific articles from the area Michael works in. Note, that he is a physicist. The physicists were among the first where the movement for Free Science grew. He thinks about a contribution and comes back to us.
• [StefnMn] Katja Mruck is involved in the FQS project which is a Free scientific magazine.

3.1.2. "Intellectual property"

3.1.2.1. "Intellectual property" in other fields (pharmaceuticals, seeds, genes)

• [StefanMn] Christian Wagner from Buko Pharma wants to come for the topic pharmaceuticals / generica.
• [StefanMn] James Love spoke about pharmaceuticals / generica among other things.
• [StefanMn] Michael Frein (Evangelischer Entwicklungsdienst - EED) gave a presentation about seeds and "intellectual property" (I missed it).

3.1.2.2. Thoughts on copyright / remuneration and alternatives

• [StefanMn] Philippe Aigrain declared interest but could not come because of timing problems. He wrote Positive Intellectual Rights and Information Exchanges.
  Mail address did not work out.
• [StefanMn] Peter Eckersley (Australia) gave an interesting talk about alternative forms of remuneration. Unfortunately I did miss the end where he may have presented his own suggestions and thoughts.
  Is interested.
• [StefanMn] Michele Boldrin and David K. Levine do interesting things about copyright based on conventional economist theory. They could be an interesting invitation.

3.1.3. Free Software

3.1.3.1. Free Software, market, work

• [StefanMn] Perhaps Tom Schwaller who now works for IBM as Linux evangelist. Especially I would be interested in how IBM makes money on basis of Free Software.
  Has not been contacted yet.
• [StefanMz] It would be interesting to invite people criticizing "Integrierten Betriebswirtschaftlichen Systemen" (IBS) like SAP. For instance Sabine Pfeiffer who published an interesting article in the FIFF magazine. In particular together with Free Hardware people this could get exciting. Sabine wants to come.

3.1.3.2. Free Software in less developed countries

Free Software in the so-called III. World would be an interesting topic. It could range from the governmental decisions for instance in South America to development cooperations like VUM (FranzN knows more).

• [StefanMn] I met Mothobi Mokheti at "We Seize!". He's involved in Khanya College. Currently he is starting some activities to bring Free Software to social projects. This is pretty much what we are interested in. He took the CfC as a flyer.
• [StefanMn / Graham] Someone from one of the South American governments who advocate Free Software. Brasil or Venezuela come to mind.

3.1.4. Theory

3.1.4.1. On Free Software and Information Society in general

• [StefanMn] Gundolf Freyermuth who wrote a number of very good essays on current developments in the up-coming information society and also understood Free Software very well.
  Wants to come.
• [StefanMn] Pekka Himanen has been invited again
  Unfortunately the date does not fit for him :-( .
• [StefanMn] Yochai Benkler's Coase's Penguin, or, Linux and the Nature of the Firm has been suggested to me two times during the last months. The conclusion I found very Oekonuxy indeed. We should invite him. He is professor in Yale.
  May be he could be invited by the Department of Philosophy?
  AlanT has been asked to contact him or do something himself.
• [Chris] Alan Toner, who did a session with Jamie King at the 2. conference could do a session on copyright and/or 'Information freedom' or something interesting. He probably wrote this article on the WSIS: Dissembly Language: Unzipping the World Summit on the Information Society
• [StefanMn] Eric von Hippel probably created http://opensource.mit.edu/ and also published some interesting papers.
• [StefanMn] Sheen S. Levine which gave a talk at the 2. conference would like to participate in the 3. one, too. I found his talk very interesting so I'd advocate this.

3.1.4.2. From a political background

• [StefanMz] André Gorz because of his new book "L'Immatériel". Interview under http://www.woz.ch/wozhomepage/26j03/gorz26j03.html.
  StefanMz asked him but unfortunately he feels to be to old for traveling. May be someone from his environment could be asked instead?
• [Chris] Raoul Victor, who wrote Free Software and Market Relations could do an interesting session based on that or something else. The New Questions section at the end contains material for several sessions.
  I don't know whether he received the CfC explicitly.
• [StefanMn] I made a contact to Thomas Atzert one of the translators of Empire. I think between Oekonux and Empire the full potential to learn from each other has not yet been tapped. He made a note of the date.

3.1.4.3. Principles of Free Software and organization / domination / law

• [StefanMn] Since the 1. conference I wanted to have someone telling us about the theses of Lawrence Lessig - namely "Code is Law". The Berlin based people around Bernd Lutterbeck / Robert Gehring are the first who come to mind.
• [StefanMn] An alternative or add-on could be Johann Bizer who I came to know on the e-democracy Workshop and who I liked.
• [Leopold] An interesting pool could be the Vienna based http://www.infolaw.at/.
• [StefanMn] Erik Möller made a presentation about the topic "Why do Slashdot, Wikipedia and other big Free projects work? How does decision making work there?". Also is involved in the WOS conference.
• [Chris] Ion Nec might be interested in doing a session on "Free media production - How Indymedia works" or something like that. She had written UkNetworkSnapshot which is interesting because it shows how much like a Free Software project Indymedia is.
  I guess Chris contacted her already.
  She suggested that we do a joint session on how indymedia works and how it is like a Free Software project. This session could have a title "Indymedia ? the journal of the revolution?" or something like that...
• [StefanMn] I'd love to have someone on the conference who can tell us about what the Debian constitution means in practice. How is it handled? Why do people align to it? What if they don't? A introduction to the constitution itself for sure would be helpful for such a talk. Martin "Joey" Schulze could be interested.
• [Chris] Wikipedia also has some process to handle problems. This could also be an interesting thing to look at at the conference in some OHA focus. There are several ways to contact the Wikipedia; IRC and lists and the village pump or even using the details on the contact us page. Jimmy Wales as the founder of Wikipedia would also be interesting.
  I don't know whether there is any contact already.
• [Chris] Jamie King has written an article on Openness And Its Discontents - this might be something that could form the basis of a session on openness? Also "working in public" could be a label for this.
  I don't know whether there is any contact already.

3.1.5. General

3.1.5.1. From the movement

• All people participating in the Project Oekonux of course :-) .
• [Graham] Somebody of Hipatia. Probably Juan Carlos Gentile from Italy and if we have lots of money Diego Saravia from Argentina.

3.1.5.2. Miscellaneous

• [StefanMn] Shuddhabrata Sengupta was very interesting to me. He thought about the phenomenons of Free Software with structure and in depth.
• [StefanMn] I'm not sure whether this really fits but this may be because I'm quite ignorant of this area. However, there seems to be some movement around WLAN / WiFi / Open Access and so on. I have no idea who could be reasonably asked for a contribution.
• [Helmuth] Matthias Greffrath has visions. FranzN cited him two times in Die Vision der globalen Dörfer
  I don't know whether he received the CfC.
• [Chris] The issue of "Women and the Free Software mode of production" came up at the WSIS discussions (and on the German list quite a number of times -- StefanMn). Why are there so few women doing free software development? Are there other projects on the net that use this mode of production that are dominated by women (I suspect that this is the case)? And if so what are they and what can be learnt from them? Maybe london.crafts.

3.1.6. More ideas?

Add here or under the header matching best.

3.2. Proposals received so far

Proposals which have been made so far to projekt at oekonux.de should be listed here. The link in the archive should be included so we have a common reference to all proposals here. Also it would be good to include the location someone comes from because (unfortunately) this may be an important aspect in terms of money.

The following table gives the state as of 2004-03-21. It contains the results of the informal opinion poll on http://moin.oekonux.org.uk/CoferenceProposalPoll in this encoding

Symbol	Meaning
Number	Received this many "Must be invited"
0	Had at least one "Should be invited"
/	Had only "Does not matter to me"
-	Had at least one "Should not be invited"
?	Conflict: Received "Must" and "Should not"

The list is sorted by the results and category.

Result	Name	OT	pox	Shortcut	Category	From
Accept	Isabel Saij	OT	[pox]	CopyleftArt	Art	Germany
Accept	Meretz / Hipp	OT	[pox]	UnionCMS	FreeSoftware	Germany
Accept	Yuwei Lin	OT	[pox]	EMACS	FreeSoftware	Britain
Accept	Stefan Merten	OT	[pox]	OHAProject	Oekonux	Germany
Accept	Benni Bärmann	OT	[pox]	Brötchen	Oekonux	Germany
Accept	Raoul Victor	OT	[pox]	Marxism	Oekonux	France
Accept	Graham Seaman	OT	[pox]	TechnologySociety	Oekonux	Britain
Accept	Till Mossakowski	OT	[pox]	Automation	Oekonux	Germany
Accept	Thomas Atzert	OT	[pox]	ImmaterialLabor	Politics	Germany
Accept	Enki Böhm	OT	[pox]	Compensate	Politics	Vienna
Accept	Andrius Kulikauskas	OT	[pox]	FlashMobs	Politics	Lithuania
Accept	Hans-Gert Gräbe	OT	[pox]	ProcessPreparation	Politics	Germany
Accept	Christoph Spehr	OT	[pox]	OHANetworks	Politics	Germany
Accept	Glatz / Schandl	OT	[pox]	Streifzüge	Politics	Vienna
Accept	Stephan Eissler	OT	[pox]	Property	Politics	Germany
Accept	S Bipin Agravat	OT	[pox]	IndianVillage	Project	India
Accept	Sheen S. Levine	OT	[pox]	Emergence	Science	Philadelphia/USA
Accept	Manfred Füllsack	OT	[pox]	IntellectualIncome	Science	Vienna
Accept	Gundolf Freyermuth	OT	[pox]	OSPractice	Science	Arizona/USA
Accept	Aputsiaq Janussen	OT	[pox]	HackerEthic	Science	Greenland/Denmark
Accept	Michael Zaiser	OT	[pox]	SelfOrganization	Science	Britain
Accept	Wolfgang Pircher	OT	[pox]	ExchhangeAsBasis	Science	Vienna
Accept	Edward Cherlin	OT	[pox]	Simputer	Transfer	California/USA
Accept	J. Martin Pedersen	OT	[pox]	FSwIndymedia	Transfer	Britain
Accept	Christian Wagner	OT	[pox]	Medication	Transfer	Germany
Accept	Marcin Jakubowski	OT	[pox]	FSwEcology	Transfer	Wisconsin/USA
Accept	Gunter van Aken	OT	[pox]	WikeResearch	Transfer	France
Accept	Herbert Hrachovec	OT	[pox]	OpenArchive	Transfer	Vienna
Accept	Wolfgang Polatzek	OT	[pox]	TransformEconomy	Transfer	Austria
Accept	Stefan Matteikat	OT	[pox]	ThingInternet	Transfer	Germany
Accept	Andreas Trawöger	OT	[pox]	OpenBandwidth	Transfer	Vienna
Accept	George Dafermos	OT	[pox]	CounterGlob	Transfer	Greece
Accept	Christof Beaupoil	OT	[pox]	FreeHardware	Transfer	Germany
Accept	Claus Müller	OT	[pox]	OpenCraft	Transfer	Germany
Accept	Marion Hamm	OT	[pox]	Indymedia	Transfer	Britain
NoInv	Jörg Hafer	OT	[pox]	ELearning	FreeSoftware	Germany
NoInv	Michele Lionetti	OT	[pox]	FreeLibrary	FreeSoftware	Italy
NoInv	Patrice Riemens	OT	[pox]	PoliticalEconomyIP	Politics	France?
NoInv	Wolf Göhring	OT	[pox]	OvercomingWar	Politics	Germany
NoInv	Helmut Dunkhase	OT	[pox]	PlannedEconomy	Politics	Germany
NoInv	Jaco Aizenman	OT	[pox]	VirtualRights	Politics	Costa Rica
NoInv	Jaromil	OT	[pox]	Rasta	Transfer	Vienna?
NoInv	Thilo Jahn	OT	[pox]	UserCommunities	Transfer	Germany
Reject	Sarawut Chutiwongpeti	OT	[pox]	VideoArt	Art	Denmark?
Reject	Michael Schreiber	OT	[pox]	CopyrightNumbers	Art	Vienna
Reject	Jörg Bergstedt	OT	[pox]	CreativeAction	Politics	Germany
Reject	Martin Hardie	OT	[pox]	Crisis	Politics	Mozambique
Reject	Felipe Perez Marti	OT	[pox]	TaxationPublicGoods	Politics	Venezuela
Reject	Markus Hauser	OT	[pox]	Glocondis	Project	Germany
Reject	Marcelo D'Elia Branco	OT	[pox]	FSwBrazil	Project	Brazil
Reject	Franz Aigner	OT	[pox]	OpenPolitics	Transfer	Austria
Revoked	Aviv Kruglanski	OT	[pox]	FreeClothes	Transfer	Spain